Chris:(From Novel)Jane and Rochester marry with no witnesses other than the parson and the church clerk. Jane writes to her cousins with the news. St. John never acknowledges what has happened, but Mary and Diana write back with their good wishes. Jane visits Adèle at her school, and finds her unhappy. Remembering her own childhood experience, Jane moves Adèle to a more congenial school, and Adèle grows up to be a very pleasant and mild-mannered young woman.
(From Movie)Jane and Mr. Rochester get married ,but at the end the movie doesn't show Jane writing letters to her cousins. Also, the movie doesn't show Jane moving Adèle into a better school, it just ends with Jane and Mr. Rochester(Who has regained his sight) in the forest with two kids walking. I think they need to make movies that don't cut out parts from the novel, even if it is really long.
I like the direct interpretation from the movie you put at the end of your post, it enforces what you stated in the first paragraph quite nicely that the movie and novel are different. Though they have the same plot because the movie derived from the novel; they both end up being totally different. For me(from reading the post) I believe that I would stick to reading the novel because it is in much more detail. And novels are supposed to be for the imagination and for you to interpret it from you're view, which makes reading the novel much more special. :)
ReplyDelete